DRM Software Radio Forums  

Go Back   DRM Software Radio Forums > DRM Software Radio - User Forums > General Topics
User Name
Password
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 10-02-2018, 19:24   #61
tpreitzel
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,311
Alokesh,

Thanks for posting this news. I especially like the promotion of the non-audio aspects of DRM as this aspect is precisely the component that has the most potential for informing the "listener". I, too, would like to see DIVEEMO both standardized and promoted.

Now, if AIR would only restart DRM broadcasting on shortwave with 16 QAM modulation and the xHE-AAC codec from their transmitter in Bangalore!

http://alokeshgupta.blogspot.com/201...ed-at-bes.html

Last edited by tpreitzel : 10-02-2018 at 20:12.
tpreitzel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2018, 19:25   #62
tpreitzel
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,311
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aetheradio
The main problem with DRM is nobody can buy or build a receiver that complies fully with the current standard.
It must have both DRM30 and DRM+
It must have all codecs and rates including xHEAAC

The modulation doesnt matter much between 64QUAM and 16QUAM on shortwave. I did enough practical on air tests to show there was maybe a half dB in it. Once your reception gets in the noise below minimum thats it. When things are this bad, only AM works.
The BBC tests on MW went to lower constellation at night due to adjacent channel interference. This is no longer a problem on SW because most everybody has left.

Ralph

Ralph,

Logs on this forum and the experience of other members including myself clearly demonstrate otherwise. The threshold for decoding 16 QAM is MUCH lower at the receiver than 64 QAM even on the MW band. I should know as I have tested it with my DRMAX-1 transmitter. Furthermore, I don't have access to your tests so I can't and won't comment on them specifically. Regardless, ANY lowering of the threshold for decoding a DRM signal on shortwave is an improvement so, again, the use of 16 QAM on shortwave is absolutely necessary to MAXIMIZE decoding for the listener and supported by the thousands of logs on this forum. Therefore, we'll have to agree to disagree.

The inclusion of other codecs isn't really necessary in the DRM standard as xHE-AAC finally realized DRM's potential on shortwave when used in conjunction with 16 QAM ONLY modulation. Opus might be nice, but it certainly isn't necessary now with the advent of xHE-AAC.

As far as including DRM+ capability in receivers, it's not really necessary either, but would probably improve the market for a DRM receiver.

In conclusion, I'll agree partly with your comments that shortwave listening is currently declining because of both ignorance and convenience. Both of these latter factors can and will likely be overcome when more desperate times arise for an individual or even country ... Life isn't always rosy or cozy.

Last edited by tpreitzel : 10-02-2018 at 19:45.
tpreitzel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-04-2018, 03:30   #63
tpreitzel
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,311
"Old" Analog Concept of Targeting Nations

With the multiple service capability of DRM, the old analog idea of narrowly targeting nations should be dying, but won't until those analog broadcasters die as well unfortunately. It's an awful thought, but apparently true. Engineers are so conditioned by ideology and practice, it'll be difficult to change the situation until new engineers arrive on the SW scene along with further refinements in low bit-rate compression. This latter process is already occurring, but will require more time. I'm NOT saying there will NEVER be a need to target a nation, but that the general practice will decline as multiple service capability is properly employed.

Even with 16 QAM modulation, the current DRM xHE-AAC codec can readily accommodate multiple audio streams and languages with decent quality. Even now, the perceived need for narrowly targeting nations via shortwave is rapidly disappearing and SW broadcast engineers need to rethink their old habits.

Last edited by tpreitzel : 23-04-2018 at 20:16.
tpreitzel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-06-2018, 16:42   #64
tpreitzel
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,311
If it's possible, the DRM standard will soon have to incorporate 4 QAM modulation into the standard which will be a boon for digital shortwave. Then, digital shortwave broadcasters should be restricted to either 4 or 16 QAM modulation. The continuing research of incorporating AI techniques into codecs will allow audio from ultra low bit-rates below 3 kbps. Essentially, we're already there. Dolby has purchased Coding Technologies and released AC4. Opus will be following the others into the lower end a la Codec2 and its variants. All of this research will be a boon for digital shortwave and its listeners.
tpreitzel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-06-2018, 01:28   #65
tpreitzel
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,311
Video ports, e.g. HDMI, should be a standard component on digital radios as well as COMPACT IR remote controls on desktop units. When I'm working on various tasks, I don't want to have to stop and twiddle knobs or walk to a radio with a small screen to read data. An HDMI port will allow me to connect a micro projector. Although radio on VHF, HF, and MW bands will probably always remain a primarily audible experience, I can definitely foresee visual data increasing its share of that experience. Hence, designers and manufacturers need to prepare now. Radio data is primarily an attachment to an old analog paradigm. Purely digital technologies like HD, DRM, and DAB haven't been properly deployed since their inception. Again, the old analog paradigm has been replaced so stop thinking within the boundaries of its mental cage.

User-friendly digital radio is flexible and anonymous which are the main reasons for my continued involvement with DRM.

Last edited by tpreitzel : 29-06-2018 at 19:11.
tpreitzel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-07-2018, 14:00   #66
tpreitzel
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,311
Digital IS the way forward on broadcasted bands. I was listening to Ted Randall of WTWW who was promoting his advertisers on shortwave and wondered about his effectiveness. Since the advent of the Spynet, listeners want comparative information before buying products which can only be done digitally. It's possible to promote SERVICES adequately on analog platforms, but I'm not so sure about PRODUCTS. Today, people expect reviews, both pro and con, on products before purchasing. Asking those potential buyers to access the Spynet is both cumbersome and unnecessary. Why not just use a digital platform such as DRM and broadcast that extended information so a buyer can decide without having to access the Spynet?

Digital broadcasters need to update their ancient analog thinking again, in this case, the promotion of their advertisers' products.

Last edited by tpreitzel : 31-07-2018 at 16:18.
tpreitzel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2018, 21:50   #67
tpreitzel
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,311
Congratulations to this Indian radio club for their educational program featuring DRM. Hopefully, Indians will conduct more such informal sessions. I'd like to see other nations conduct similar sessions, but the limited availability of broadcasts is problematic.

https://alokeshgupta.blogspot.com/20...t-chennai.html
tpreitzel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2018, 21:45   #68
tpreitzel
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,311
Content

This thread is generally about simplifying digital reception on the broadcasted bands, primarily shortwave, for the masses. I've already discussed rational and robust configurations for digital shortwave. If broadcasters want to be heard with reasonable quality on shortwave, they should heed my recommendations. Now, let's look at content briefly.

The masses want the truth, but aren't generally willing to expend the effort to find it. Hence, unscrupulous broadcasters have lead to the rise of the mass media, or propaganda for the lazy masses.

With the aforementioned said, scrupulous broadcasters will attempt to provide those lazy masses with the truth. However, the truth will likely NOT be found in regurgitating one's biases over the air. Truth is found by diligently searching for all possible facts, incidental or direct, regarding a topic. For example, Dr. Michael S. Heiser, a biblical scholar with a different view than many in his field, has the ability and sufficient training to adequately interpret ancient texts. Michael's views on the paranormal can be found in his work, "The Facade", as well as more recent publications. I use Dr. Heiser as an illustration of someone who would serve as a counterpoint to some of the traditional interpretations found in ancient texts which should be broadcasted over the air. In EVERY field of human endeavor, a scrupulous broadcaster should monitor his own biases before selecting content to air.

Remember, the masses WANT the truth, but aren't willing to expend much effort to do so which is a weakness that unscrupulous broadcasters exploit.

Last edited by tpreitzel : 14-10-2018 at 23:01.
tpreitzel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 18:14.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.