DRM Software Radio Forums  

Go Back   DRM Software Radio Forums > DRM Software Radio - User Forums > Reception Results - Recent Posts
User Name
Password
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 29-11-2013, 07:11   #1
tpreitzel
Registered User
 
tpreitzel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,526
RNZI @ 11690 kHz

Ambient Conditions: 38 F @ surface, RH 59 %, clear, average noise, PC on, M2 off ( 1 dB loss )

I won't rate this partial log, but reception was much better than expected for my location, time of night, and season of the year. However, IF RNZI wants coverage of western parts of the NA continent including Canada during the northern winter, they'll have to revert to using a frequency in the 41 meter band during the early morning hours here or early evening hours there.
Attached Images
File Type: png 11690-131129-0742-0757-DR111.png (37.0 KB, 983 views)

Last edited by tpreitzel : 29-11-2013 at 07:17.
tpreitzel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-11-2013, 06:08   #2
tpreitzel
Registered User
 
tpreitzel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,526
Ambient Conditions: 45 F @ surface, RH 45 %, overcast, average noise, PC & M2 off ( 0 dB loss )

Although noisy, I can currently comprehend the audio of RNZI's analog broadcast on 11725 kHz while RNZI's digital broadcast on 11690 kHz is currently decoding at a SNR of ~ 9 dB on my DR111. Clearly, more power is needed. Let's have power levels for digital broadcasts at 60% of analog instead of the 40%, please. If my DR111 actually saves the log, I'll post it within the hour as I'm removing power from my main PC in a vain attempt to increase the SNR by one more dB.

Update: Eureka! The problem was due to my use of three temporarily installed 6' unshielded cables with 3.5 mm plugs that remain to be replaced. I must have been initially mistaken as the rise of 6 dB @ 0704Z must have been when I removed power to my main PC. Anyway, back to logging reception of digital broadcasts.
Attached Images
File Type: png 11690-131130-0656-0753-DR111.png (40.5 KB, 936 views)

Last edited by tpreitzel : 30-11-2013 at 11:56.
tpreitzel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2013, 07:15   #3
tpreitzel
Registered User
 
tpreitzel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,526
Ambient Conditions: 42 F @ surface, RH 55 %, overcast, average noise, PC & M2 off ( 0 dB loss )

I can't explain this erratic log at all, i.e. the sudden MASSIVE rises in SNR. Does Rangitaiki use a rotatable antenna? Atmospheric noise bordered on high throughout the broadcast. At least, I was able to hear part of an excellent rendition of "Silent Night" by the Christchurch Sacred Heart Church's Christmas Choir.

BTW, I'm now receiving RNZI @ 9870 kHz at a solid 21 dB, but I don't plan on logging it tonight. Although something (PC off) is causing these MASSIVE changes in SNR, I can't explain them. I'll have to continue my monitoring.
Attached Images
File Type: png 11690-131201-0653-0755-DR111.png (37.7 KB, 959 views)

Last edited by tpreitzel : 01-12-2013 at 07:31.
tpreitzel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2013, 07:19   #4
tpreitzel
Registered User
 
tpreitzel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,526
Ambient Conditions: 44 F @ surface, RH 57 %, overcast, average noise, PC & M2 off ( 0 dB loss )

Decoded Audio: Fair
Attached Images
File Type: png 11690-131202-0708-0756-DR111.png (40.7 KB, 936 views)
tpreitzel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2013, 07:14   #5
tpreitzel
Registered User
 
tpreitzel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,526
Ambient Conditions: 5 F @ surface, RH 83 %, snow, average noise, PC & M2 off ( 0 dB loss )

Decoded Audio: Unacceptable

Another unexplainable log on this frequency ... If possible due to the absence of interference, RNZI, drop 17675 kHz and substitute 13730 kHz in its time slot. If possible, drop 13730 kHz from its current time slot and substitute 11690 kHz in its place. Next, drop 11690 kHz from its current time slot and substitute 9870 kHz in its place. Lastly, drop 9870 kHz from its current time slot and substitute a frequency in the 41 meter band in its place. Hummm, you USED to do something similar. RNZI may be the Voice of the South Pacific, but they certainly aren't the Voice of the Pacific.
Attached Images
File Type: png 11690-131204-0701-0754-DR111.png (38.7 KB, 893 views)

Last edited by tpreitzel : 04-12-2013 at 07:21.
tpreitzel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2013, 07:50   #6
tpreitzel
Registered User
 
tpreitzel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,526
Ambient Conditions: -7 F @ surface, RH 67 %, clear, average noise, PC & M2 off ( 0 dB loss )

I won't rate this partial log, but there was no strange behavior this morning.
Attached Images
File Type: png 11690-131205-0659-0717-DR111.png (38.7 KB, 1027 views)
tpreitzel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2014, 08:51   #7
F1BJB
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Beauvais France JN19BL
Posts: 631
As usual nothing at all in DRM from RNZI for me.
One nice thing with them is the associated AM transmission 11725 in that case.
And each time I tuned to them I could easily understand why DRM doesnt work
A very unstable signal indeed
F1BJB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2014, 09:14   #8
Digger
Registered User
 
Digger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Shizuoka City, Japan
Posts: 9,809
The Forum clock is out of order!

I just checked RNZI around 0740 UTC on 11690 kHz in DRM and all I get is some time and frame syncs.

True, the AM signal 35 kHz up tells it all... all flutter.
__________________
Regards,
Terje

https://www.hobbyradio.se/en/drm/web....index_en.html
Digger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2014, 09:38   #9
tpreitzel
Registered User
 
tpreitzel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,526
SW Speed: High, SW Density: High
Environmental Conditions: PC on, M2 off ( 2 dB loss )

Evidently, RNZI is still experimenting with their frequencies ... Yesterday, 11675 kHz, today 11690 kHz. RNZI, changing the MSC to 16 QAM and a 14.56 kbps bit-rate would be wiser than switching frequencies.
Attached Images
File Type: png 11690-140404-0723-0757-DR111.png (38.5 KB, 756 views)
tpreitzel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2014, 11:26   #10
F1BJB
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Beauvais France JN19BL
Posts: 631
Well as there is the possibility to switch to AM I think that it is best for them
to use the high quality modes of DRM.
The musical content of their program deserves it IMHO.
F1BJB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2014, 23:58   #11
tpreitzel
Registered User
 
tpreitzel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,526
A mere loss of < 1 kbps will have a negligible negative impact on quality, but a significantly positive impact on reliability.

Last edited by tpreitzel : 05-04-2014 at 03:25.
tpreitzel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2014, 05:55   #12
tpreitzel
Registered User
 
tpreitzel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,526
Environmental Conditions: PC on, M2 off ( 2 dB loss )

Decoded Audio: Fair ... RNZI, switch to a MSC of 16 QAM!
Attached Images
File Type: png 11690-140405-0504-0753-DR111.png (42.6 KB, 738 views)
tpreitzel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-04-2014, 10:04   #13
tpreitzel
Registered User
 
tpreitzel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,526
Environmental Conditions: PC on, M2 off ( 2 dB loss )

I won't rate this partial log. After battling with installing radio automation software, Rivendell, on my Slackware64 machine, I'll leave posting the remaining logs for 11690 kHz for the next couple of days. Although Rivendell does function nicely, the developers should bring the system out of the stone age of PAM and QT3.
Attached Images
File Type: png 11690-140407-0623-0755-DR111.png (41.0 KB, 844 views)

Last edited by tpreitzel : 13-04-2014 at 10:49.
tpreitzel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-04-2014, 21:03   #14
F1BJB
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Beauvais France JN19BL
Posts: 631
AM interference on 11695 Khz at 19H00 UTC in French from China
10Khz side bands

Last edited by F1BJB : 13-04-2014 at 21:06.
F1BJB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-04-2014, 07:38   #15
tpreitzel
Registered User
 
tpreitzel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,526
Environmental Conditions: PC on, M2 off ( 2 dB loss )

I won't rate this partial log.
Attached Images
File Type: png 11690-140408-0613-0756-DR111.png (40.5 KB, 807 views)
tpreitzel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 16:52.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.